Compare Canon EF 70-200mm f 2.8L IS III USM Lens vs Canon EF 70-200mm f 4L IS II USM Lens vs Canon EF 70-200mm f 2.8L IS II USM Lens
The Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS III (mk3) though it can be found for about $1900 when it has a $200 rebate, is almost the same optical formula as its predecessor, and certainly not a massive leap ahead of the Sigma in any one regard. Lastly, the Sony 70-200mm f/2.8 GM, at $2,598, is not a whole $1100 better, either. The 70-200 2.8 L IS ii has many advantages over the 135L. However be conscious that the in no way the zoom can replicate the look given by the prime. Period. Bluerio's gear list: Sony a7R III Sony a7 III Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM Art Sony FE 55mm F1.8 Sony FE 70-200 F4 +8 more. I have extensively used these two lenses HOWEVER my EF is the II, not the III. So whether there are any differences between those two EF versions, I wouldn't be able to say. Here are my thoughts concerning the EF 70-200 f/2.8 IS USM II and the RF 70-200 f/2.8 IS USM: RF pros: RF is extremely sharp at all f-stops. Even wide open. The reason it is so tough is that it is made out of metal, which does make the lens heavy. It weighs in at a solid 1.4kg or 3.08 lb. it is built like a tank, but it weighs like one too. It isn’t Constant f/2.8 Maximum Aperture throughout Entire Zoom Range. Canon’s Air Sphere Coating (ASC) Minimizes Ghosting and Flare. Optical Image Stabilization at up to 3.5 Stops* of Shake Correction. Fluorine Coating on Front and Rear Elements to Help Reduce Smears and Fingerprints. Highly Resistant to Dust and Water, and Improved Durability Even

2018 aura été l'occasion pour Canon de renouveler ses deux zooms 70-200 mm de la série L. Après le test en juin de la version f/4, c'est au tour du 70-200mm f/2,8L IS III USM de se mesurer à

Yes, the added cost is well worth it in the case of the f/2.8L or the f/2.8L IS II. The IS models, both f/4 and f/2.8, are weather sealed, while the non-IS models are not. The EF 70-200mm f//2.8L IS II USM is a very sharp zoom lens, and very well built. I strongly recommend buying the lens that you want, and not one to tide you over.
I have the EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II and EF 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS, and recently got the R5 but only have the RF 15-35 f/2.8L IS at the moment. What do you shoot? I shoot a couple things: Landscape: I mostly use a 16-35, 24-70, and 70-300 for this setup. The 70-300 is more compact and lighter than the 70-200 f/2.8, and I don't need f/2.8 for landscapes.
73pvaL.
  • 370b0acdz1.pages.dev/533
  • 370b0acdz1.pages.dev/619
  • 370b0acdz1.pages.dev/441
  • 370b0acdz1.pages.dev/223
  • 370b0acdz1.pages.dev/238
  • 370b0acdz1.pages.dev/316
  • 370b0acdz1.pages.dev/641
  • 370b0acdz1.pages.dev/190
  • 370b0acdz1.pages.dev/69
  • 370b0acdz1.pages.dev/856
  • 370b0acdz1.pages.dev/131
  • 370b0acdz1.pages.dev/757
  • 370b0acdz1.pages.dev/345
  • 370b0acdz1.pages.dev/176
  • 370b0acdz1.pages.dev/666

    • canon 70 200 f2 8 is ii vs iii